The question Evangelical Protestant - (Hemeroliberalismo) in question

The question Evangelical Protestant - (Hemeroliberalismo) in question

* Posted by Charlemagne Levita Yerudiktus on 7 October 2010 at 17:10

(Days of the folha.com ...)

A journalist calls INGNORANTES those who fit the question what is said against the legalization of ABORTION.

Well, let's think about it ....

In a journey through biblical times ... where we meet King Herod (Pedigree) (Idumea) printing with his own hands one of the most terrifying massacres infanticidal throughout the history of
Humanity.

More after all, what motivation would a man at such a high degree of insanity and hedonism?

The Bible gives us a narrative that seems to point out the reasons which would have led to this; UNDER THE BIRTH OF A (INFANTE) (POOR) BUT (NOBRE. ..) of a Noble (noble) Herod
(Desconhecida. ..) The Prince was born in a "manger" "IT"
over there was actually established site for "PARIMENTO OF" COW "
subrime paradox that gives us a (paradigm) so subrime
context ... "And the saga of hedonistic Herod takes shape and form when
(Equally) to illustrate to our eyes (thin) the attitude of
king who is ABORT THE LIFE OF CHILDREN two years down ...)
NAZARETH (birthplace of the Prince, was a province of people
(Humble) (ie) poor ....) (qv) A particular character of the Bible
quipped to the city on this issue (John 1; 46)

So the question ultimately comes from the confrito (ambiguidades. ..) Once you find out who is who in this issue of interest by (implement all) from a LAW THAT COME AND LEGITIMATE
THE END (LEGALIZE) the practice of abortion.

POINTS TO CONSIDER

By posting relatively contrary, the Catholic Church breathes representative to the context (elections). And this seems to represent a party faithful CONFLICTING of the scale. in
question.

Fiat voluntas in your sicut et in terra cielo ... "

Since the heady days of Zwingli, the Protestant-Evangelicals are recognized as CONSERVATIVES. (Ex Cathedra) Although according to that, have occurred (wars) (nuns) in view of the most varied (CONCERNED) arising from the long and
flowing ground that so long as a converged
the prerogatives (primacy) that since the (Martyrs Peter and the AP
Rev. Paul) Two of legitimate PATRIARCHS Evangelical Church
Apostolica) Tanta pendenga and provokes discussion within universal ...." When (aforiza) the question of "cure" to the bitter truth ..."( Ad rem) (De auditu) where a (value) and a ( truth) become (relatively) only by us, not interested .. When we reach ... "

This is in part the assumption that the question-Evangelical Protestant advocate while working to implement a paradigm tendency (insidious) in order to pre-establish it in view of
(Said) (homophobia) a pattern of biased pseudo-sphere ....) To
such power would, citing issues of Islam.

Recently the French government wanted to establish the use of BAN SHADOR (the headscarf) by Muslim women in public places. the measure provoked immediate reaction from the Muslim community. Mainly Muslim women who posted the contrary
possible to measure the French government. (Especially since it is a
ISSUE OF MUSLIM PRECEITUAL ...) This is the paradigm
relevance to the above question. It is for this that the question plisma
accuses (tratamento. ..) by some points that are relevant to
question such as;

- That homosexuality and lesbianism among the Muslims is regarded as practice (ugliness) to terminate its connotation is strictly PRECEITUAL question, What is different in gender, number and degree
purpose of (pseudo-biased) trying to give the issue ...) It is
exactly this point that the question seeks to bump yourself (counting
for it with a (nap) of EVANGÁLICO LEGISLATURE)

The respect for beliefs CLED AND CUSTOMS can never come with the ASSUMPTION. without distinction or advocate against a particular DEFENSE (PRINCIPLE) of faith and belief has already been established and
DEFENDED by the current constitution of the country the character of the question presents itself, the genesis of proven CLED RITES AND PRECEPTS (Ex nihilo nihil) regarding the
ordems questions of (previously) established ...)( as is the case for
ANGLICAN example of the issue which adopts what Homosexuality
must be unconditional respect ...) So it is appropriate
consider the aspirations of LEGITIMATE DEFENSE such principles. A
it does not hurt the established order of things ...)() (Ab initio) and neither the question for her fojem plisma order restricted ritual ...)

(Hic Hoc opus .... Labor. ... Est)

Are the (hands) (outside) than it is (intended) to (cause) that tries to cry so much hurt a cause as fervently as he ran the blood established the (Martyrs) that were made for the same cause
(Die) and in whose cause ADOPT IN PRINCIPLE TO BELIEVE LOVE DEFENDER proclaims TIME OR OUTSIDE.

This is the insignia of the cause EVANGELICAL - PROTESTANT

In ab initio ... .. Ad Hoc Ad Hominem Ad gloriam .... .. .. ad honorem ad libitum ..

Ad Ad Limina ... perpetuate rei memoriam ...

(Gen. 1; 27)

The order of the Protestant churches have long been through winning this right even in the face (as already stated) the unspeakable loss of life .. (Ad augusta per angusta

Ad valorem ad referendum .. .. Vitae aeternam ad .. .. .. Aequo animo)

Counterfactual (yet) the ideal that attempts to affect the consciousness (in question)

I (use) (barely) the same product (exordium) whose content is an essential part of a (remarkable) Antiphon Roman Catholic, and still say we do (our) (this) that the present scope and nature gives way to
This defense Apostolic

"Gaude Cunctas Haereses Sola Interemisti in Universe mondo ..."

(Fr Antonio Vieira)

Charlemagne Levita-Yerudiktus